HOMESERVICESABOUTBLOGPRESS CLIPSASK MILTON
Nutrition Tips from One Source Nutrition


Archive for the 'restaurant' Category
« return to blog home

Menu Survival Guide
Monday, April 26th, 2010

Dining out can wreak havoc on your diet! Hidden calories, oversized portions and the sheer variety of so many delicious, though often unhealthy, menu choices are just some of the obstacles we face when booking that reservation. That’s why I’ve decided to share my top tips for a guilt-free night out that trims your waistline, without trimming your social life!

Menu Survival Guide:

1. Go online before you dine! Take a look at that menu. Prepare a game plan!

2. Don’t starve to carve: Cutting meals during the day in an effort to save calories will only set you up to overindulge at dinner. Instead, have a small snack to tide you over before going out to eat.

3. Start smart! Have a side salad or broth-based soup to help curb hunger. Studies show that diners who used this method ate 20% less.

4. Minimize vs. supersize: Order two appetizers for your main meal, or share one entrée, or ask your server to wrap half your meal to-go beforehand to keep your portions in check.

5. Balance is beautiful: Instead of having a glass of wine, a slice of bread and dessert — have a glass of wine and split the dessert!

6. Ask and you shall receive: Never be afraid to politely ask your server to make substitutions to better fit your diet needs. Know your menu terms for trimming:

Order: Grilled, roasted, steamed, broiled, baked, or poached meals

Not: Crispy, au gratin, fried, stuffed, creamy, tempura, sautéed, pan-fried, escalloped

Bon appétit!

Posted by admin  /  Filed under restaurant  /  Comments: 0



A Case for Menu Labeling
Monday, January 4th, 2010

While I am still “on-the-fence” about menu labeling–and tend to favor not labeling–I asked a colleague to share her thoughts about why we should label menus for nutrition content.  Her thoughts (and references) are below. 

A Case for Menu Labeling

By Sally Kuzemchak, M.S., R.D.
Real Mom Nutrition
http://www.realmomnutrition.com/

When I think about the debate over restaurant menu labeling, I think about a stick of butter—specifically, the stick of butter that is melted into the marinara sauce at a certain Italian bistro (that will remain nameless) here in Columbus, Ohio.

I wouldn’t know about this dirty little secret unless one of the servers was a friend of mine. Who knew that penne with marinara could be just as lethal as fettuccine alfredo? But that’s the problem with restaurants: You can order your salad dressing on the side, choose baked instead of fried, and pick red sauce over cream. But when it comes right down to it, you have no clue what really goes into your food—and how it all adds up.

And neither do the pros. When put to the test, even dietitians consistently underestimate the calorie and fat content of restaurant meals—in one study, by 687 calories and 57 grams of fat for a hamburger with a side of onion rings. Perhaps that’s because it’s hard to wrap the brain around one meal containing 1,550-calories, the amount some women should have for the whole day.

Everyone knows that restaurant portions are out of hand and that eating out is no longer reserved for indulgent celebrations (unless you’re regularly celebrating, say, the fact that it’s Tuesday). Calorie counts on menus and menu boards would cut out the guesswork and let you have a shot at making well-informed choices. In a new study from Yale University, diners who saw the calorie content of menu items (plus a 2,000-calorie-per-day reference) ate 250 calories less at dinner and afterwards than those who got less info, or none at all. And that can really make a difference: If you eat out twice a week, it’s a seven-pound weight loss every year.

Yet the bottom line is that even with menu labeling, you still have to eat defensively when eating out. In a recent study in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association, researchers analyzed meals at popular restaurant chains to check the accuracy of the advertised calorie counts. The results: While some were right on—or pretty close—others were way, way off. An order of P.F. Chang’s asparagus was listed as 260 calories but clocked in at 558, and a Taco Bell Express Taco Salad’s published value was 326 but actually packed 607.

So trust your gut and know your portion basics (a deck of cards equals a serving of meat, a half of a baseball equals a serving of grains or ice cream, and the size of your fist equals a serving of baked potato). If the restaurant’s portion size looks off the charts, eat half. But as much as possible, cook your own food at home. And save the butter for baking.

References:

Backstrand J, Wootan M, Young L, Hurley J. Fat Chance: A survey of dietitians’ knowledge of the calories and fat in restaurant meals. Center for Science in the Public Interest: Washington, DC. 1997 January.

Roberto C, Larsen P, Agnew H, Baik J, and Brownell K. Evaluating the Impact of Menu Labeling on Food Choices and Intake. American  Journal of Public Health. Dec 17 2009. [Epub ahead of print]

Urban L, Dallal G, Robinson L, Ausman L, Saltzman E, Roberts S. The Accuracy of Stated Energy Contents of Reduced-Energy, Commercially Prepared Foods. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. January 2010 (vol. 110, issue 1, pp. 116-123).



Posted by admin  /  Filed under Sally Kuzemchak, calories, menu labeling, restaurant  /  Comments: more



About this blog

Milton is a registered dietitian/nutritionist, food and nutrition journalist, and former restaurateur who blogs about food, nutrition and health.

Twitter Updates


    follow me on Twitter

    Milton’s Career Advice Book for Dietitians


    Blogroll


    Recent Posts


    Polls

    Sorry, there are no polls available at the moment.

    Search Postings


    Categories


    Foodie BlogRoll





    Copyright © 2010 One Source Nutrition, LLC  |  Link Exchange

    Site by JPD Studio